The Problem with Generic Names
Continuing from Tuesday's post on simplicity in names, today I want to talk to you a bit more about generic names.
To put it simply, generic names suck. Think about it, are you loyal to a brand with a generic name? We buy books from Amazon, well designed gadgets from Apple, furniture from IKEA and search the web on Google. When you come to think of it, most popular brands don't have a generic name. There are still some old brands with very generic names, but now they present a shortened or abbreviated version of it. Take General Electric for example, their brand name is now GE and you will rarely find a reference to the original name.
Last Tuesday I was at an event on Social Innovation, I was really surprised with the lack of creativity and uniqueness of brand names from the companies that were attending. A lot of the names were very descriptive, difficult to remember and very generic. Imagine me coming up to you at a crowded event and saying that my company name is "The Brand Consultancy That Focuses on Simplicity", would you remember it? But people still fall for this trap, as I witnessed first-hand on Tuesday.
The solution is simple, whenever a generic name comes up during your naming sessions either park it or shut it down. The best you can do if someone insists on it, is morph it to a unique name. Abbreviate it, shorten it, keep the parts that you like and morph it into a single word. Better yet, come up with something unique and follow the advice on Tuesday's post. You won't regret it.
